. Verification: 8ea7dd8e8067cf6e

President Biden Found Guilty of Violating First Amendment Right

In a world where memes and cat videos reign supreme, who would have thought that Big Tech censorship could become the star of the show? Dive into the captivating drama of online freedom versus content control as the Fifth Circuit Court dishes out its verdict on President Biden's involvement. Is your right to free speech at stake, or are we just stuck in a digital re-run of "1984"? More on this below. Keep reading if you dare, but remember, Big Tech is always watching, and so are the cats—those adorable, privacy-invading cats

In a recent ruling, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a significant blow to the Biden administration, finding that it had violated the First Amendment rights of American citizens. The court issued an injunction against an agency within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for its involvement in coordinating with social media giants to censor free speech related to the 2020 election.

The Fifth Circuit Court's Verdict

The Fifth Circuit Court's decision extended the scope of an existing injunction that restricts President Biden's ability to communicate with Big Tech companies. Notably, this injunction now includes the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) within the DHS.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, leading the litigation against the Biden administration, referred to CISA as the "nerve center" of a vast censorship enterprise, alleging that it collaborated with the FBI to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story.

A three-judge panel, in their court order, characterized CISA as the primary facilitator of the FBI's interactions with social media platforms. They revealed that CISA closely collaborated with the FBI to influence the platforms to modify their content moderation policies, particularly concerning "hack-and-leak" material.

CISA's Role in Content Moderation

According to the court's opinion, CISA's operations were described as merely relaying flagged social media posts from state and local election officials to the platforms. However, the court suggested that CISA's involvement went beyond mere relay.

CISA used its frequent interactions with social media platforms to advocate for more restrictive content moderation policies concerning election-related speech. Moreover, CISA officials played a decisive role in determining the accuracy of flagged information. Consequently, when the platforms enacted censorship, it was often influenced by CISA's pressure and evaluation of the content's veracity.

The judges concluded that CISA's actions likely significantly contributed to the platforms' content moderation decisions, potentially infringing upon the First Amendment.

The Lawsuit and Its Impact

The injunction originated from a lawsuit filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, accusing high-ranking government officials of collaborating with major social media companies to combat misinformation. Unfortunately, this effort resulted in the censorship of speech on various topics, including Hunter Biden's laptop, COVID-19 origins, and the effectiveness of face masks.

Several government officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci and FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan, were deposed during the legal proceedings.

Federal Judge Terry A. Doughty of the Fifth Circuit issued the initial injunction on Independence Day, arguing that the government's actions during the pandemic resembled an Orwellian "Ministry of Truth." The injunction suggested that if the allegations made by the plaintiffs were true, this case could represent one of the most significant attacks on free speech in U.S. history, with the government disregarding the First Amendment's right to free speech.

The Department of Justice has appealed the court order to the Supreme Court, asserting that it could lead to "irreparable harm" by hindering the government's ability to collaborate with social media companies on initiatives to safeguard the American people and democratic processes.

Hot Take: It's a digital jungle out there, and the real question is, who's the king of the internet? Is it you, the user, or is it Big Tech? With the Fifth Circuit Court's ruling, the balance of power seems to be shifting. While we navigate this wild online world, let's not forget that even though cats rule the internet, we shouldn't let them dictate our rights. Stay vigilant, stay informed, and keep those memes coming.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real Raw News needs reader support to survive and thrive. 

Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Contribute to Real Raw News via  GoGetFunding




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.