Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program, initially designed to provide end-of-life options for adults, has recently stirred controversy by considering the inclusion of infants under the age of one. In this article, we'll delve into the contentious aspects of this proposal and its potential implications for society.
Infants and Euthanasia: A Complex Issue:
Infants Under One Year: A Complex Conundrum
The idea of offering "assistance in dying" to infants under the age of one raises several ethical and practical questions. After all, these infants cannot express their desires, making it challenging to determine if they are truly suffering and if this is the right path to take. As a parent, I can recall moments when my own children experienced what seemed like unbearable pain due to routine illnesses. However, these pains, though intense at the time, were temporary and faded with time. It is a reminder that what appears unbearable in one moment can evolve into a distant memory.
Physician Approval: A Crucial Safeguard?
One proposed safeguard is that a physician's approval would be required for any decision to euthanize infants. However, this may not offer complete protection against hasty or ill-considered decisions. Some physicians, like Dr. Green, an enthusiast for MAiD, have actively participated in euthanizing adults. This raises concerns about whether they can truly safeguard the lives of infants. Dr. Green, for example, switched from maternity care to end-of-life care, citing similarities between the two in terms of their intimate nature and emotional intensity.
Organ Harvesting Concerns:
Valuable Organs and Ethical Dilemmas
A significant concern surrounding this program is the potential for organ harvesting. Infants who may be deemed not valuable enough to live could have organs that are considered valuable. While organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure, the idea of harvesting organs from infants who cannot consent raises ethical questions. The question arises: is there an inherent conflict of interest in this scenario?
Financial Incentives and Ethical Dilemmas
Euthanasia is not a lucrative procedure and is often performed by doctors with a genuine belief in its benefits. On the other hand, organ transplantation is a profitable industry, benefiting doctors, surgeons, and hospitals. While organ transplants do save lives, the process of harvesting organs from infants who cannot object to their euthanasia presents a disturbing ethical dilemma.
The Uncertainty of Infant Judgment:
Who Deserves to Live?
Determining which infants are beyond hope is a challenging task. It is important to remember that many individuals who were born with severe health problems have gone on to lead productive lives. The question of whether we can pass judgment on an infant and claim with certainty that they deserve to die remains a contentious issue.
Conclusion: The potential inclusion of infants in Canada's MAiD program is a topic that sparks heated debate. It raises fundamental questions about the ethical, practical, and emotional aspects of such a proposal. As society grapples with these complex issues, it is essential to engage in open and respectful dialogue to find the most compassionate and just solution for all parties involved.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real Raw News needs reader support to survive and thrive.
Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Contribute to Real Raw News via GoGetFunding
