Well, bravo CDC, bravo! Who needs transparency and accountability when you can just sweep adverse events under the rug? It's truly remarkable how the CDC's innovative approach to "data collection" has left us all scratching our heads and wondering, "Why even bother?" It's almost as if they're saying, "Why worry about a few million health impacts when you can just binge-watch Netflix and forget it all?" But hey, who needs to trust science and reliable data when you can have a good old game of vaccine roulette? Stay safe out there, folks! And remember, the CDC is always watching... from a safe distance, of course.
In a recent revelation, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been implicated in a covert effort to manipulate and downplay the collection of adverse events stemming from COVID-19 vaccines reported via the agency’s V-Safe platform. As the number of individuals claiming to be "adversely impacted" by these vaccines continues to rise, the CDC's actions have cast a shadow over the transparency and accountability of the vaccination process.
A Quiet Scrubbing: The CDC's Deceptive Move
The CDC's conduct has come to light through its treatment of the V-Safe page, where a perplexing message appears: "Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023. If you have symptoms or health problems following the COVID-19 vaccination that concern you, please contact your healthcare provider. You can also report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)."
Underlying this message is the CDC's declaration that it ceased enrollment in the V-Safe program on May 19, citing its specific focus on COVID-19 vaccines. The CDC, however, has proposed the development of an updated version of V-Safe to accommodate post-vaccination experiences with new vaccines. This move raises questions about the transparency and continuity of vaccine monitoring.
Impressive Enrollment, Disturbing Outcomes
Since its launch in December 2020, V-Safe has managed to amass a substantial number of participants. The CDC boasts an enrollment of 10.1 million individuals who have completed over 151 million health surveys detailing their experiences following COVID-19 vaccinations.
According to data accessed by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), a prominent advocacy group, 3.53 million participants claimed to have suffered adverse impacts due to vaccination out of the total enrolled pool. This staggering number includes 1.2 million individuals unable to perform regular activities, 1.3 million missing school or work, and 800,000 requiring medical intervention. The cumulative reports reveal a total of 6.45 million instances of health impacts.
Disparities in Impact: A Demographic Breakdown
A comprehensive analysis of the impacted individuals' demographics highlights disparities within the data. Among the impacted population, white individuals have been significantly affected, accounting for 2.6 million out of the 3.53 million impacted cases. Within the white demographic, females constitute the majority, with 1.9 million cases. Moreover, the data shows that 200,000 Asian and 200,000 black individuals also experienced adverse impacts.
Deciphering the Symptoms
An examination of reported symptoms provides insight into the range of effects experienced by individuals. Among a total of 71.29 million reported symptoms, pain emerges as the most frequently documented, with a staggering 19 million instances. Fatigue follows closely with 11.7 million reports, trailed by headaches at 9.1 million, and muscle/body aches at 7.2 million. Over 751,000 individuals reported the need for care post-vaccination, revealing the profound impact of the vaccination on their health.
A Controversial CDC Decision
Criticism has mounted around the CDC's decision to halt the V-Safe program. Dr. David Gortler, a former member of the FDA's senior executive leadership, expressed his concerns. He noted the unprecedented nature of suspending data collection on safety—a decision that appears particularly ill-advised given that V-Safe was collecting information about mRNA vaccines, a novel technology with uncertain long-term consequences.
The CDC's discontinuation of V-Safe is in stark contrast to its ongoing encouragement of COVID-19 vaccination, even for children as young as six months. This paradox raises eyebrows, especially as both manufacturers and the FDA have withheld a comprehensive list of vaccine ingredients, including potentially impactful components like lipid nanoparticles.
Challenging Trust and Transparency
The reliability of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has also been called into question by the CDC itself. This raises the pressing concern of where a trustworthy repository for vaccine adverse events can be found. Curiously, the CDC refuses to participate in such an initiative. This lack of accountability and transparency has led to accusations of corruption and jeopardized public safety.
Revealing Brand Impacts
Data from December 9, 2022, reveals a total of 909,868 reports of VAERS adverse events in the United States across all six vaccines in use. This includes 96,140 serious adverse events and 15,733 deaths. Among these figures, the Moderna vaccine takes the lead, with 1.6 million reported adverse events, followed closely by Pfizer with 1.4 million.
In conclusion, the CDC's actions surrounding the V-Safe platform have sparked concern over the integrity of vaccine data collection and transparency. The agency's decision to halt V-Safe raises questions about accountability and trust in vaccine safety monitoring. As debates continue regarding the effects of COVID-19 vaccination, transparency, and comprehensive data collection remain crucial for informed decision-making and public health.
We need your help to continue to post news that matters...You can support our efforts by buying us a coffee... It’s quick, secure, and easy. https://gogetfunding.com/realnewscast/