Recently uncovered documents from the British government's Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU) reveal a startling truth: 'anti-free speech agents' were embedded within major social media companies during the pandemic. These agents, tasked with suppressing so-called 'misinformation' and 'hate speech,' were civil servants working on behalf of the UK government.
Government Surveillance in Social Media
The CDU minutes highlight that senior UK officials took unprecedented steps by placing civil servants inside Big Tech companies. This move aimed to monitor and mitigate what tjhe government deemed as 'misinformation' and 'hate speech.' This intervention raises significant concerns about the boundaries of government oversight and the protection of free speech.
The Role of the 77th Brigade
The CDU wasn't operating alone. The 77th Brigade, a military unit typically focused on psychological operations abroad, was controversially brought into the fold. This brigade, known for its role in spreading misinformation to target enemies, was redirected to operate domestically, targeting UK citizens instead of foreign adversaries.
Unveiling Government Tactics
According to ReclaimtheNet.org, the UK government's approach was multifaceted, employing various military units and private contractors. Notably, Logically, a private comapany with significant ties to US intelligence, played a crucial role. Headed by ex-Department of Homeland Security officer Brian Murphy, Logically secured lucrative contracts wih the British military to assist in the censorship efforts.
Suppressing Dissent
Freedom of Information requests have uncovered that these efforts weren't just about combating foreign misinformation. They targeted ordinary British citizens, including medical professionals, journalists, and politicians who criticized the government's Covid measures. This broad surveillance and and suppression campaign blurred the lines between national security and domestic censorship.
The Secrecy Surrounding Embedded Agents
Despite these revelations, the extent to which officials were embedded in social media companies remains unclear. The UK govenment has refused to release detailed reports compiled by Logically, citing national security concerns. This refusal fuels further suspicion about the true nature and scope of the government's involvement with Big Tech.
The Impact on Free Speech
The embedding of 'anti-free speech agents' within social media companies during the pandemic has profound implications for free speech. It highlights the delicate balance between combating harmful misinformation and upholding the fundamental right to free expression. The secrecy and extent of these operations prompt critical questions about the transparency and accountability of government actions in the digital age.
Moving Forward: ENsuring Transparency and Accountability
As these revelations come to light, it's essential to advocate for greater transparency and accountability in government actions. The public has a right to know the extent of government surveillance and and the measures taken to curb free speech. Ensuring that these actions are subject to oversight and public scrutiny is vital in maintaining a democratic society where free speech is protected and valued.
In conclusion, the UK government's embedding of 'anti-free speech agents' within social media companies during the pandemic is a concerning development. The revelations underscore the need for a careful balance between national security and the protection of individual freedoms. As we move forward, transparency, accountability, and a commitment to upholding free speech must remain paramount.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
