In recent developments of the ongoing COVID Inquiry in the UK, shocking revelations have emerged, shedding light on the failures of lockdown policies and the questionable role of government advisors and the media in promoting them. Let's delve into the details and uncover what's been unearthed.
Examining Lockdown Fallout: Government Advisor's Critique
One of the pivotal moments in the inquiry came when Mark Woolhouse, a top government advisor from the University of Edinburgh, criticized the media, particularly the BBC, for misrepresenting COVID risks to justify harmful lockdown measures. Woolhouse, an expert in infectious disease epidemiology, highlighted the severe repercussions of lockdowns on various aspects of society, including the economy, education, mental health, and healthcare access.
Woolhouse emphasized the lack of a formal assessment of the anticipated impact of lockdown measures, despite the glaringly obvious potential for harm. He pointed out that that government advice failed to consider the broader consequences of pandemic responses, such as school closures and restrictions on outdoor activities. He highlighted the disproportionate impact of COVID on different age groups, likening the risk to children to being struck by lightning in a playground while emphasizing the heightened danger to the elderly.
Moreover, Woolhouse criticized the media for sensationalizing rare cases of COVID-related deaths among healthy adults, thereby creating a misleading narrative of the risks asociated with the virus. He suggested that such misinformation fueled public support for sweeping lockdown measures, contributing to the government's decision-making process.
Media's Role in Promoting Lockdowns: BBC Under Scrutiny
The BBC, a prominent news outlet, faced criticism for its coverage of the pandemic, with accusations of amplifying government narratives in favor of lockdowns. Despite facing backlash, the BBC continued to defend lockdown policies, with its "disinformation reporter" drawing parellels between lockdown critics and climate change deniers.
While the BBC attempted to downplay its role in promoting government policies, other media outlets, such as The Telegraph, highlighted Woolhouse's critique of harmful measures like school closures and lockdowns. This disparity in coverage underscored the complexities surrounding the pandemic response and the varying perspectives within the media landscape.
Questionable Advising: Devi Sridhar's Conflicting Testimony
Another significant aspect of the inquiry involved Devi Sridhar, a professor of global health who advised Scotland's leadership during the pandemic. Sridhar's testimony revealed inconsistencies regarding her stance on "Zero COVID" policies aimed at eliminating the virus entirely.
Despite initially advocating for Zero COVID strategies, Sridhar's testimony appeared convoluted, leaving the inquiry counsel perplexed and prompting additional clarification requests. Her ambiguous position raised questions about the effectiveness of government advisory mechanisms and the coherence of pandemic response strategies.
Conclusion
As the COVID Inquiry unfolds, it exposes the shortcomings of lockdown policies and highlights the intricate dynamics between government advisors, the media, and public health strategies. The revelations underscore the need for transparent and evidence-based decision-making in navigating future pandemics, emphasizing the importance of learning from past mistakes to safeguard public health and well-being.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real Raw News needs reader support to survive and thrive.
Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Contribute to Real Raw News via GoGetFunding
