President Donald Trump's attorneys are fervently advocating for the dismissal of the case brought forward by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The legal team, in a series of motions filed this week, presents compelling arguments for the dismissal of the case on various grounds.
Challenging Allegations
In response to Smith's accusations that the 45th president mishandled classified documents upon leaving the White House and obstructed investigation efforts, Trump's defense has pleaded "not guilty." The defense maintains that Smith's actions are politically motivated, with the aim of influencing the upcoming general election, where Trump may once again be a contender against Democrat President Joe Biden.
Questioning Appointment Legitimacy
Trump's legal representatives raise significant concerns regarding the legitimacy of Smith's appointment as Special Counsel by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland. They argue that such an appointment, without Senate confirmation, violates the Appointments Clause. This, they assert, undermines the rule of law and questions the authority of Smith to prosecute the case.
Invalid Establishment of Office
Additionally, Trump's legal team challenges the existence of a statute allowing for the establishment of Smith's Office of Special Counsel. This lack of legal basis, they contend, renders Smith's prosecution of Trump unlawful, further weakening the case against the former president.
Constitutional Violations Alleged
Highlighting potential constitutional violations, Trump's attorneys argue that Biden's utilization of Smith to prosecute a political opponent breaches the Appropriations Clause. They assert that the funding for Smith's endeavors lacks proper authorization and accountability, posing a threat to the integrity of the legal process.
Awaiting Judicial Decision
While Trump's legal team has submitted several motions, not all details have been disclosed to the public. The judge presiding over the case has yet to issue rulings on any of the motions, leaving the outcome pending.
In conclusion, the legal battle between Trump and Smith underscores the complex interplay of political motivations, constitutional interpretations, and legal procedures. As the case unfolds, the decisions made will undoubtedly have significant implications for both parties involved and the broader landscape of American politics and jurisprudence.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real Raw News needs reader support to survive and thrive.
Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Contribute to Real Raw News via GoGetFunding
