The revelation from an insider in the German insurance industry this month has sounded an alarm about a potentially concerning future trend: the potential for all cars to be remotely disabled in the near future.
In a letter initially sparked by discussions on a YouTube channel focused on digital ID concerns, an unnamed source, employed within the IT department of a prominent German insurance comany, shared insights that many dismiss as conspiracy theories.
The whistleblower sounded the alarm about the widespread lack of understanding regarding the consequences of fast-paced technological progress, specifically the integration of artificial intelligence. They pointed to various pilot initiatives within their sizable insurance company as evidence of a worrisome trend.
The "Remote Control" project proposes a future where electric cars become the norm, possibly due to insurance restrictions on older vehicles. These cars would collect real-time data on drivers, including location, local dietary habits, driving styles, and even incorporate a built-in breathalyzer. Notably, the project suggests that these vehicles could be remotely disabled if alcohol is detected, regardless of whether the driver's blood alcohol concentration is within the legal limit.
According to the source, there is a possibility of a joint venture between the organization and the Federal Ministry of Defense and National Security, which might result in the development of technology to remotely disable vehicles, with influential individuals being a prime target, by 2025.
The allegations, first introduced on the Survival Lilly YouTube channel, sparked investigations that appeared to substantiate certain aspects of the whistleblower's claims. Jack Pegoraro, a British classic car enthusiast, thoroughly examined each claim made in the letter and uncovered supporting evidence from multiple credible sources. He found that car manufacturers, insurers, and regulatory agencies were engaged in efforts that corresponded with the described advancements.
Breathalyzer integration, mandated by laws in the U.S. and Europe, speed limiters, and data collection mechanisms aligned with the whistleblower's claims. Pegoraro's findings mirrored the concerns raised in the letter, indicating a worrisome trajectory where personal data, driving behaviors, and even dietary habits could dictate insurance premiums and potential vehicle access.
The interplay between cutting-edge technology, large corporations, and government entities painted a picture of a future where pervasive monitoring of personal data might substantially erode individual liberties and privacy.
Although the motivations behind these shifts might not be entirely rooted in govenrment schemes, but instead propelled by technological progress fueled by private organizations, the potential consequences are still significant. The crucial step lies in holding lawmakers responsible, guaranteeing that the future landscape adheres to democratic values and protects personal liberties in a world where technology plays a dominant role.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
