The concept of the "Deep State" has been a topic of much debate and controversy in recent years. In this article, we will explore the origins and evolution of the term while debunking common misconceptions surrounding it. From its portrayal as a patriotic safeguard to its association with conspiracy theories, we'll delve deep into the subject to provide a comprehensive understanding.
Understanding the Deep State The term "Deep State" has gained significant notoriety, particularly during the Trump administration. However, to grasp its true essence, we must first define what it means. The Deep State, in a general sense, refers to the entrenched bureaucracy of government employees, including both appointees and career officials, across various sectors like civil service, military, intelligence, and foreign service.
The Evolution of the Deep State In July of the previous year, David Rothkopf wrote an article titled "You're going to miss the Deep State when it's gone." In this piece, he expressed concerns about President Trump's attempts to replace career government workers with loyalists. It's essential to note that the perception of the Deep State has evolved significantly over the years.
The Deep State as a Check on Autocracy During his presidency, Donald Trump often expressed frustration with government employees, both appointees and career officials. He perceived them as obstacles to his autocratic ambitions. This perception marked a significant departure from the earlier view of the Deep State as a safeguard against autocracy.
Challenging Misconceptions The Deep State, once seen as a protector of democracy, took a hit to its reputation in the eyes of some due to conspiracy theories propagated by figures like Alex Jones and Infowars. These theories suggested that the Deep State was involved in shadowy and sinister activities.
Debunking Conspiracy Theories It's important to debunk these conspiracy theories and separate fact from fiction. Career government officials, who make up a significant portion of the Deep State, are not engaged in nefarious activities to undermine democracy. Instead, they play a crucial role in maintaining stability and continuity in government operations.
In a mere decade, the concept of the deep state has undergone a remarkable transformation, slowly fading from mainstream discourse. This transformation can be likened to one of the most thorough whitewashing efforts in history, reminiscent of the Soviets' meticulous erasure of Yezhov and Trotsky from photographic records. It is truly an astounding feat.
As we delve into the turn of the 21st century, you'd be hard-pressed to find American political writers frequently invoking the term "deep state." However, a significant shift occurred in the mid-2000s, coinciding with the enactment of laws such as the PATRIOT Act and the exponential growth of colossal agencies like the Department of Homeland Security under the Bush/Cheney administration. Suddenly, the term "deep state" permeated discussions, often wielded as a critique from the left side of the political spectrum against the Bush-Cheney legacy.
A decade ago, the landscape was vastly different. An opinion piece published by The New York Times casually asked the late NSA whistleblower, Thomas Drake, a figure who would today likely be labeled a traitor, about his reading preferences. Drake's response was revealing. He disclosed that he was engrossed in "Deep State: Inside the Government Secrecy Industry" by Marc Ambinder. Ambinder's revelations regarding potential surveillance activities in the Washington D.C. area, including close proximity to the White House, Congress, and foreign embassies, ignited concerns that prompted the ACLU to push Congress towards the encryption of communications.
Just before a wave of disturbing revelations regarding intelligence abuses, epitomized by the Edward Snowden case, progressive American commentators enthusiastically adopted the term "deep state." They found it perfectly encapsulated the threat they perceived emanating from the highly concentrated, unelected power that had gripped the nation during the Bush years. Even liberal icon Bill Moyers collaborated with Mike Lofgren, a former Republican operative turned vocal critic of the GOP, to craft a report titled "The Deep State Hiding in Plain Sight." Bill Moyers passionately denounced this state-within-a-state alongside Lofgren.
The Resurgence of the "Deep State"
Over the past decade, the once-prominent concept of the deep state has seemingly faded into obscurity. However, this phenomenon was not always the case. Just a short while ago, the term was at the forefront of American political discourse, particularly as a critical lens through which to scrutinize the Bush-Cheney administration's actions.
A Decade of Transformation
The world has undergone significant changes in the past ten years, including a remarkable shift in the usage of the term "deep state." At the dawn of the 21st century, this phrase was rarely uttered by American political writers. Yet, by the mid-2000s, it had become a ubiquitous presence, often employed as a left-leaning critique of the Bush-Cheney legacy.
Thomas Drake and the Reading List
To gain insight into the past, we can look to an illuminating interview with Thomas Drake, a prominent NSA whistleblower. Drake considered an inspiration for Edward Snowden, was asked about his reading material a decade ago. His response was "Deep State: Inside the Government Secrecy Industry" by Marc Ambinder. Ambinder's revelations about potential surveillance activities in the Washington D.C. area, including locations near the White House, Congress, and foreign embassies, triggered concern and prompted the ACLU to advocate for the encryption of communications.
Progressive Adoption of "Deep State"
In the lead-up to a series of revelations concerning intelligence abuses, notably the Edward Snowden case, progressive American commentators enthusiastically embraced the term "deep state." They saw it as the perfect descriptor for the perceived threat posed by the hyper-concentrated, unelected power that had alarmed them during the Bush years. Even the esteemed Bill Moyers joined forces with Mike Lofgren, a former Republican operative turned staunch GOP critic, to produce a report titled "The Deep State Hiding in Plain Sight," in which they decried this hidden power structure.
The evolution of the term "deep state" in the past decade showcases how language and its connotations can transform in response to political developments and shifting perspectives. While it may have receded from the spotlight for now, its enduring impact on political discourse remains undeniable.
In conclusion, the term "Deep State" has undergone a transformation in recent years. While it was once perceived as a bulwark against autocracy, it has been clouded by conspiracy theories. However, it is essential to distinguish between the Deep State as a concept of career government employees and the unfounded allegations surrounding it. Understanding the Deep State's true role in government is crucial for a more informed and nuanced discussion.
So, dear readers, after diving into the murky waters of the Deep State, we've peeled back the layers of conspiracy theories and political intrigue. Now, if you happen to find a clandestine group of bureaucrats plotting world domination over coffee and donuts in your local government office, please let us know. Until then, remember, the only deep thing here might just be the rabbit hole of theories!
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
