Oh, what a relief it is to have social media platforms take the noble task of safeguarding us from the perils of climate change misinformation! With their unwavering commitment to silencing dissenting voices and promoting a single, approved narrative, we can finally rest assured that our minds are safe from the terrors of independent thought. Who needs free speech anyway when we can rely on the infallible judgment of corporate-backed tech giants to decide what's true and what's not? So, let us bask in the warmth of conformity and enjoy the blissful ignorance that comes with being told what to think. #ClimateControlledDebate #SilencingDissent #ApprovedNarrative
What a joyous time we live in, where social media platforms have taken it upon themselves to be the arbiters of truth when it comes to climate change. It seems they have appointed themselves as the guardians of scientific consensus, ensuring that only the officially approved narratives are allowed to grace our screens.
In a stunning display of even-handedness, these platforms are targeting both the Right and the Left, because who needs political diversity when it comes to discussing such a crucial issue? If you dare to question the government's preferred climate "solutions" or the interests of their corporate buddies, well, you can kiss your online presence goodbye.
Let's take a look at some prime examples. Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy had the audacity to post climate-related campaign messages on LinkedIn, only to find his account suspended. How dare he assert that fossil fuels are necessary for human prosperity? How dare he suggest that oil production could be shifted to places like the U.S. and China? Thankfully, after a little public pressure, LinkedIn had a change of heart and reinstated his account. But the incident serves as a stark reminder of the expanding power of social media companies to moderate "climate misinformation" and influence our political landscape.
The World Watches in Horror This Disgusting Show of Globalization Gone Wild
And it's not just the Right that's feeling the heat. YouTube decided to attach a condescending "Context" note to an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as he dared to discuss his views on climate change. Can't have anyone straying from the official United Nations definition of climate change now, can we? The video is now gone, replaced with a delightful "Community Guidelines" warning. How helpful!
But fear not, TikTok has also jumped on the censorship bandwagon. They proudly announced their new policy to remove climate change misinformation, targeting those who dare to deny its existence or question the factors contributing to it. It's like a digital crusade for the righteous defenders of scientific consensus!
Of course, Facebook couldn't be left behind. They've been busy censoring prominent climate contrarians like Michael Shellenberger and Bjorn Lomborg, who have the audacity to challenge the "scientific consensus" and advocate for the use of fossil fuels and nuclear energy. How dare they go against the holy grail of clean energy and challenge the prevailing narratives? Thankfully, social media platforms are here to save us from such heresy.
Is King Charles Racing Against Time to Save the Planet? Unveiling the Climate Countdown Clock
But let's not forget the real motivation behind all this censorship. It's not about ensuring the spread of accurate information or fostering open debate. No, it's about big corporations, government entities, and political interests manipulating the climate debate to push their own agenda. They're using social media platforms as their pawns, stifling alternative perspectives and approaches that don't align with their preferred "solutions."
Oh, the irony! They claim to be combating the spread of misinformation, but what they're really doing is suppressing any discussion that challenges their vision of clean energy and the costs associated with it. Because, you know, we all have to move fast and embrace their predetermined solutions without question. Who needs debate and critical thinking anyway?
So, let us bow down to the mighty social media gods who have taken it upon themselves to dictate what we can and cannot say about climate change. They know best, after all. Who needs diverse opinions when we can have a sanitized, one-sided conversation? Thank you, social media overlords, for protecting us from ourselves and making sure we only see what you want us to see. How fortunate we are to be under your watchful gaze.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real Raw News needs reader support to survive and thrive.
Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Contribute to Real Raw News via GoGetFunding
