Unraveling the Geopolitical Chessboard: The Nord Stream Gas Pipeline Attack and the Shadow of Suspicion

State Terrorism Strikes Nord Stream Gas Pipelines

Russian President Vladimir Putin has emphatically denounced the battle of the Nord Stream gas pipelines as an appalling act of state terrorism. The attack, he contends, was a computed move to erase a formidable energy competitor in the West. This striking allegation was revealed during a virtual event of G20 leaders where Putin expressed grave concerns about the competitive methods prevailing in the energy world.

Damage of Energy Links: Deciphering the Nord Stream Disaster

The NOrd Stream 1 and 2, constituting a vital linkage between Russia and Germany, faced a devastating blow. Last September's series of explosions near the DAnish island of Bornholm obliterated 3 out of the 4 lines, severing Germany's vital force connection with Russia. Consequently, Germany's energy landscape now relies on pricier American liquefied natural gas, intensifying its economic dependence.

Unreasonable Competition Techniques and Claims of Sabotage

In a poignant declaration, Putin highlighted the implementation of unjust competitive techniques to get rid of competitors and get a strategic edge. The sabotage of transport and monetary channels, consisting of the obliteration of the Nord Stream gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea, stands as a stark example of these callous strategies.

Blame Game: Unveiling Allegations without Certainty

Regardless of refraining from directly identifying the perpetrator behind the attack, Putin formerly endorsed American journalist Seymour Hersh's view, associating the sabotage to the CIA. Hersh, relying on intelligence sources, implicated the agency, alleging direct orders from the White House and cooperation with the Norwegian navy.

Beneficiary and Competition: U.S. Function in the Attack

Putin argued that the United States gained substantial gain from this assault, offered its stature as a supplier of melted gas to Europe. This vested interest fuels speculations about the U.S. involvement in the incident, shrouding the attack in geopolitical intrigue.

Clashing Theories: Unveiling Divergent Perspectives

Contrasting theories, disseminated by various Western media outlets, provide alternative narratives. One theory presumes a team of Ukrainian task forces carrying out the damage, making use of a leased luxury yacht to transfer explosives to the blast websites. Current claims by the Washington Post supposedly recognize Ukrainian figures linked to the attack, brushing off these assertions as Russian propaganda.

Crafting a story around the Nord Stream gas pipeline attack requires browsing an intricate web of geopolitical interests, in which each faction vies for dominance. As accusations and counter-allegations echo throughout interational platforms, the reality behind this wicked attack remains shrouded, leaving a trail of uncertainty and tactical scrambling among worldwide powers.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive. 

Please Contribute via GoGetFunding