Former President Donald Trump Declares Opposition to Central Bank Digital Currency
In a bold statement on Wednesday, former President Donald Trump pledged to prevent the implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), emphasizing the potential threat it poses to individual freedom. Trump asserted that allowing a CBDC would grant the govenment absolute control over citizens' finances, labeling it a dangerous encroachment on personal liberties.
Resisting Government Control: Trump's Assurance and Concerns Raised
During a gathering in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, Trump assured the public that he would thwart any attempts to introduce a CBDC in the United States. IN addition to his commitment to safeguarding financial autonomy, he promised robust protections againnst banks and regulators attempting to penalize individuals based on their political beliefs.
Political Sensitivity: Rep. Jim Jordan Reveals Alarming Financial Monitoring
Trump's remarks coincided with revelations from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), exposing federal agencies flagging financial transactions with politically sensitive terms such as "MAGA" and "Trump." This development underscores concerns about the government's increasing scrutiny of citizens based on their political affiliations.
CBDCs as Tools of Oppression: A Global Perspective
Globalists advocate CBDCs as catalysts for improving cross-border payments and constructing a new international monetary system. However, critics, including former Fed Governors, view CBDCs as potential threats to privacy and personal freedom. Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman highlighted the risks of a CBDC impeding Americans' freedom in choosing how money and resources are used and invested.
The War on Cash and the Promise of Control
CBDCs are integral to the broader "war on cash," promising a safe, convenient, and secure alternative to physical currency. While proponents argue for the elimination of cash to prevent criminal activities, opponents caution against the darker side-- government surveillance and control over consumer spending. The shift to digital economies also raises concerns about manipulative monetary policies and negative interest rates.
Global Momentum: The Rise of CBDCs Worldwide
Despite opposition, data from the Atlantic Council CBDC Tracker reveals that 130 countries, representing over 98% of global GDP, are exploring or developing CBDCs. Experimental uses, such as Zurich's issuance of a digital bond using a wholesale CBDC, indicate a growing trend toward CBDC adoption on the international stage.
Political Figures Oppose CBDC: Kennedy and DeSantis Take a Stand
Political figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis vehemently oppose CBDCs. Kennedy warns against the loss of financial privacy, while DeSantis pledges to reject central bank digital currency on his first day in office, emphasizing the government's desire to eliminate cash and cryptocurrencies.
State Resistance: Bills Against CBDCs Gain Traction
Several states, including Utah, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee, are actively resisting CBDC adoption. Proposed bills seek to prohibit classifying digital currency as money, potentially creating significant obstacles to CBDC implementation in the United States.
CBDCs and Government Power: A Dystopian Future?
Critics, including Laura Dodsworth, raise concerns about the dystopian nature of CBDCs. Programmable features could enable governments to control spending, limit transactions, and even freeze assets based on citizens' compliance with arbitrary mandates. The potential transformation of CBDCs into tools of government control raises questions about the future of personal financial autonomy.
Conclusion: Navigating the Path Ahead
As the global push towards CBDCs continues, concerns about government control, privacy, and individual freedom persist. Trump's commitment to resisting CBDC implementation reflects a broader debate about striking a balance between technological advancement and safeguarding fundamental liberties. The trajectory of CBDC adoption and its implications for personal sovereignity remain critical issues that warrant ongoing scrutiny and public discourse.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
