The Economic Ramifications of Escalating Conflict in Gaza: Insights from Experts Highlight Potential Destruction

The United States and Israel's push for an escalation of the dispute in Gaza might have severe repercussions for Western economies, according to insights from Russian military specialist Andrei Martyanov and Brighteon founder Mike Adams. In this post, we explore the economic asymmetry, military expenses, and geopolitical point of views that highlight the potential destruction.

Economic Inefficiencies and Armed Force Expenses
Mike Adams highlights a vital problem within the U.S. military budget plan-- regardless of being the largest globally, a shocking 90 percent of the funds are lost due to kickbacks, ineffectiveness, and incompetence. This ineffectiveness presents a considerable challenge as the West ponders the monetary implications of sustained military operations in the Middle East.

" There is a financial asymmetry in the expense of producing systems," exposes Adams. Comparing the production expense of standard explosive rounds, he keeps in mind that the U.S. spends around $6,000 per round, while Russia can produce the exact same round at simply 1/10 of that expense. This financial disparity extends to Iran, which can produce military weapons at a portion of the United States' expense.

Andrei Martyanov supports this viewpoint by pointing out genuine economics in Russia's military operations. He points out that Russia has actually alreayd released 6 state-of-the-art strategic missiles and submarines, each costing around $1 billion. In contrast, the U.S. Navy's Columbia class strategic rocket submarine features a significant price tag of $9 billion. This plain contrast highlights Russia's capability to preserve a formidable marine tactical rocket deterrent while optimizing costs.

Janet Yellen's Economic Optimism and Financial Realities
Contrary to concerns raised by Adams and Martyanov, Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen exhibits self-confidence in the U.S. economy's capability to support military endeavors. Yellen asserts that the Biden administration can pay for to supply military assistance to both Israel and Ukraine. She promotes the country's economic success, citing lowered inflation and a robust labor market with 3.8 percent joblessness.

Adams challenges Yellen's optimism, specifically concerning her declaration that the U.S. can "print cash for a two-front war." He contends that the country is financially strained and unable to pay for even a single-front war, let alone supporting numerous fronts. This apprehension emerges from a perceived absence of understanding of the real economy, according to Adams.

Geopolitical Perspectives on Media Impact
Adams even more criticizes Yellen, specifying that she does not understand the genuine economy. This sentiment is echoed by Martyanov, who identifies the United States as the greatest exporter of inflation. Adams humorously recommends that putting Yellen in charge of the Pentagon and Lloyd Austin in charge of the Treasury would yield the same outcome, as neither really comprehends their roles.

Shifting focus to the media's role, Adams recognizes a worrying pattern of the mainstream media cultivating ethnic hatred, especially versus Russians and Palestinians. He describes it as a type of psychological terrorism aginst the American people. Martyanov, born in the USSR, highlights the perpetuation of "Russophobia" among the Western elite, attributing it to neoconservative and Zionist dispositions within the business media.

In conclusion, the post explores the possible economic fallout of intensifying the dispute in Gaza, examining military expenditures, financial inefficiencies, and geopolitical point of views. The insights offered by Martyanov and Adams clarified the complex dynamics that might shape the future course of these geopolitical events.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive. 

Please Contribute via GoGetFunding