The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been operating a little-known program for years, gathering domestic intelligence, according to recently reviewed internal documents by POLITICO. The documents also indicate that many DHS intelligence employees are worried that their work may be illegal.
One of the key concerns is that officials under the program are authorized to conduct interviews with virtually anyone in the United States, including individuals held in immigrant detention centers, local jails, and federal prisons. Although DHS professionals must identify themselves as conducting intelligence interviews and notify individuals that participation is voluntary, legal experts are concerned that the fact they are authorized to directly interview incarcerated individuals circumvents their legal representation and raises significant civil liberties concerns.
Although the program, known as the "Overt Human Intelligence Collection Program," has been in place for years, the questioning of incarcerated individuals was paused last year due to internal concerns. The program is managed by DHS's Office of Intelligence and Analysis, which gathers information on threats to the United States, such as organized crime and transnational drug trafficking. However, this low-profile office's intelligence-gathering techniques remain relatively unknown.
According to the internal documents obtained by POLITICO, DHS intelligence employees have raised widespread concerns about legally questionable tactics and political pressure within the program. Additionally, those working within the program are afraid of retaliation if they speak out about mismanagement and abuse.
Recently, The New York Times reported that the US Intelligence community has finally admitted that the so-called Havana Syndrome, which has afflicted US personnel in multiple countries, is not caused by a foreign adversary or weapon.
Implications of the Domestic Intelligence Program
The DHS's domestic intelligence program has raised important questions about the balance between national security and civil liberties. Although the program is designed to gather intelligence on potential threats to the United States, the ability to conduct interviews with virtually anyone raises concerns about the scope of the program and the potential for abuse.
Furthermore, the fact that many DHS intelligence employees have raised concerns about illegal activity and the use of questionable tactics suggests that oversight may be lacking. The fear of retaliation for speaking out only adds to concerns about transparency and accountability.
The recent admission by the US Intelligence community that the Havana Syndrome is not the result of a foreign adversary or weapon raises additional concerns about the reliability of intelligence-gathering techniques. It is essential that domestic intelligence programs prioritize transparency and accountability to ensure that they are operating within the bounds of the law and not infringing on the civil liberties of US citizens.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
