Silent prayer outlawed outside abortion clinics: UK bishops outraged!

In a controversial move, the UK government has passed a law banning silent prayer outside abortion clinics. The new legislation has sparked outrage among the country's bishops, who have accused the government of trampling on religious freedom. The move has also sparked a wider debate about the role of prayer in public life.

Silence is (no longer) golden: the UK bans prayer!

The ban on silent prayer outside abortion clinics has come as a shock to many religious groups throughout the UK. The legislation, which is designed to protect women seeking abortions from harassment, has been criticized by some as heavy-handed and an infringement on religious freedom. Many religious groups argue that prayer is a fundamental aspect of their faith and that the ban is a clear violation of their right to practice their religion.

However, supporters of the ban argue that it is necessary to protect women seeking abortions from intimidation and harassment. They point to evidence that shows that many women seeking abortions are subjected to aggressive and intimidating behavior from anti-abortion protesters, which can be deeply distressing. The ban on silent prayer is seen as a way of protecting women from such behavior.

Bishops blast abortion clinic prayer ban

The ban on silent prayer outside abortion clinics has been met with fierce resistance from the UK's bishops. They argue that the legislation is a clear attack on the fundamental rights of religious groups. Many bishops have accused the government of trying to silence religious voices, and have called for the ban to be lifted.

The bishops have also argued that prayer is a peaceful and non-confrontational way of expressing opposition to abortion. They have argued that the ban is a clear violation of their right to freedom of expression and that it sets a dangerous precedent for the future.

The debate over the ban on silent prayer outside abortion clinics looks set to continue for some time. While some argue that the ban is necessary to protect women seeking abortions, others see it as a violation of their fundamental right to religious freedom. Whatever the outcome of the debate, it is clear that this controversial legislation has opened up a wider discussion about the role of prayer in public life, and the balance between freedom of expression and the protection of vulnerable individuals.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.