Is the climate change alarm simply a smokescreen for concealed motives? Dive into the revelations of Dr. Judith Curry as we unravel the surprising truth behind the scenes. Is it all just a clever ruse or a genuine concern for our planet's future? More on this below. Keep reading.
In the realm of climate science, an astonishing revelation has emerged, casting a shadow on the World Economic Forum's (WEF) green agenda. Dr. Judith Curry, a distinguished climatologist with a substantial body of work comprising over 140 scientific publications, has bravely come forth with a startling confession. Her confession not only questions the integrity of climate change discourse but also exposes the hidden motives behind the WEF's eco-conscious facade.
Before delving into her confession, let's shed light on Dr. Judith Curry's impressive background. She served as the former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, a position that highlighted her expertise in the field of climate science. This impressive career path adds credibility to her startling revelations.
Dr. Curry's confession unveils a troubling aspect of her past. She admits to being involved in disseminating deceptive "climate change" propaganda on behalf of the WEF. This revelation shatters the facade of environmental activism, leaving us to question the true intentions behind such initiatives.
Dr. Curry's confession doesn't stop at mere involvement; it extends to the creation of fabricated studies. She admits to having manufactured research findings that concluded "climate change" as the root cause of severe global weather patterns. Her work, unfortunately, had a significant impact on perpetuating climate alarmism.
Dr. Curry's study, which allegedly showed a significant increase in hurricane intensity, was a turning point in her career. It was published during the tumultuous times surrounding Hurricane Katrina, making it a focal point for climate alarmists. This study provided them with a strategy – tying extreme weather events to global warming.
The media's enthusiastic reception of her work catapulted Dr. Curry into the limelight. She became the darling of liberal corporate media, enjoying global recognition and praise. Her newfound status led to her being embraced by environmental advocacy groups and climate alarmists, who treated her like a rock star. She was frequently summoned to meet with politicians and was flown worldwide for such meetings.
However, as the years passed, some researchers began to identify gaps in Dr. Curry's research. These gaps were mainly related to the inconsistent data and natural climate variability. Being a diligent scientist, Dr. Curry decided to investigate these discrepancies, leading to her eventual awakening.
Dr. Curry's revelations extend to the origins of the climate-change industry. She traces its roots back to the UN Environmental Program, where some officials harbored anti-capitalist sentiments and seized on the climate change issue to further their agendas. In 1988, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was created, with a mandate to focus solely on identifying dangerous human-caused climate change.
Dr. Curry sheds light on a critical aspect of climate research – funding. National funding agencies directed resources toward researchers who made alarmist claims about "man-made climate change." This created a clear incentive structure, motivating scientists to bolster the narrative of impending environmental catastrophe.
In a recent interview with commentator John Stossel, Dr. Curry goes further to expose the globalist "climate crisis" narrative, which seeks to implement the "Net Zero" goals of the UN and WEF by 2030. This narrative relies on alarmist statements from figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Greta Thunberg, who claim dire consequences without substantial evidence.
Dr. Curry also touches upon the infamous Climategate scandal, which revealed misconduct among climate scientists. Extremists within the climate change movement waged a war against oil companies and capitalism, prioritizing policy over scientific integrity.
The bias in funding, as Dr. Curry explains, silenced neutral voices in climate research and smeared them as "climate deniers." This may have laid the groundwork for what we now know as "cancel culture" within the scientific community.
Dr. Curry's closing remarks highlight the unfortunate consequences of focusing on climate change as the scapegoat for broader societal issues. Real problems like poverty, lifestyle, poor governance, land use, and city planning are often dismissed under the blanket of "climate change."
Hot Take: So, the next time someone tries to convince you that the world is ending because of climate change, just remember, it might just be a clever ploy to score free flights and rock star treatment! Keep your skepticism alive and your carbon footprint low.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.
As the U.S. presidential landscape shifts, many are looking toward Donald Trump’s upcoming term with…
In the intricate dance of politics and celebrity, the stakes have never been higher. Recent…
Are We Alone? Exploring the Possibility of Life Beyond Earth It’s one of humanity's oldest,…
In today’s media landscape, high-profile exchanges between celebrities and political figures are not merely entertainment—they…
Tucker Carlson just dropped some truth that left Joe Rogan, a guy who usually has…
Ah, the SNC-Lavalin affair—a scandal that sent shockwaves through Canadian politics and turned Justin Trudeau's…