President Joe Biden's assertions of non-involvement in and ignorance of the Biden family's business dealings have been challenged by Devon Archer, shedding light on a more complex reality. This revelation came to light during an interview with Tucker Carlson, where Archer shared insights that cast doubt on Biden's claims.
It seems like the Biden family's business saga has more twists and turns than a soap opera. Who would've thought that Joe Biden's claims of being a spectator in his family's entrepreneurial escapades could be so entertainingly contradicted? It's almost like watching a magician trying to convince us the rabbit just jumped into the hat all by itself. But hey, who needs fiction when you've got the real-life drama of business dealings, wire transfers, and voicemails? Perhaps the Biden brand should consider rebranding as "The Family Business Chronicles." Just a thought!
The Question of Involvement: A Deeper Dive
Archer, in response to Carlson's inquiries, expressed his belief that Biden's purported lack of involvement was "categorically false." He further emphasized that the former President had more awareness of his son Hunter's business endeavors than he had let on. This contradicts the narrative that Joe Biden played no role in, nor had knowledge of, his son's business affairs.
Unraveling President Joe Biden's Connection to Family Business Deals https://t.co/qwTTRqrxJf
— Chris Wick News (@ChrisWickNews) August 6, 2023
Meeting with Partners: A Connection to Consider
Archer disclosed that Joe Biden had interacted with Hunter's business associates, a detail that undercuts the notion of complete separation from the family's entrepreneurial pursuits. This revelation was fortified by Archer's mention of a thank-you letter from Joe Biden dating back to 2011. Such interactions indicate a level of engagement that challenges the claims of detachment.
A Nexus at Burisma: A Controversial Involvement
The narrative of Joe Biden's detachment is further debunked by his connection to Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company embroiled in legal battles and allegations of wrongdoing. In 2014, both Hunter and Archer joined the board of Burisma, raising eyebrows due to its questionable legal standing. Hunter Biden reportedly received a substantial monthly payment of $83,000 for his involvement, leveraging the Biden brand.
A Complex Web of Influence: Biden's Role in Shokin's Firing
Archer's account paints a vivid picture of Joe Biden's influence in the firing of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin. Archer affirmed that Biden was indeed a driving force behind Shokin's dismissal, showcasing the intertwining of political influence and familial interests. This revelation contradicts claims of Joe Biden's ignorance of the circumstances surrounding his son's business affiliations.
The Burisma Lifeline: Biden Brand's Impact
Archer's perspective on the matter goes beyond mere acknowledgement, suggesting that the Biden brand played a pivotal role in sustaining Burisma. His belief that the company's survival hinged on its association with the Biden name implies a level of involvement that belies Joe Biden's assertions of detachment.
The Power of the Biden Brand: A Double-Edged Sword
Archer delved into the significance of the Biden brand, emphasizing the leverage it provided due to Joe Biden's vice presidential status. This perspective paints a nuanced picture of the power dynamics at play, highlighting the potential misuse of soft power for personal gain.
A Mosaic of Evidence: Undermining the Narrative
Contrary to claims of non-involvement, a mosaic of evidence emerges that implicates Joe Biden in the family's business dealings. This includes an array of sources such as texts, emails, photos with Hunter's associates, and even voicemails. Additionally, whistleblower testimonies and official forms shed light on a network of connections that challenge the narrative of ignorance.
Allegations and Testimonies: A Mounting Case
The case against Biden's supposed detachment gains traction with a series of serious allegations. Suspicious activity reports, texts, emails, and WhatsApp messages contribute to the growing body of evidence. Additionally, statements from five individuals referring to Joe Biden as the "big guy," coupled with two whistleblower testimonies, form a web of connections that suggests a deeper level of involvement.
The Investigative Trail: Uncovering Financial Transactions
The investigative trail leads to claims of wire transfers and financial transactions, adding to the complexity of Joe Biden's connection to the family business. These allegations highlight the need for further scrutiny into the nature of financial dealings and their implications.
In the Spotlight: Video Evidence and Hunter's Statements
The revelation of a video showing Joe Biden boasting about the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor adds another layer to the narrative. This piece of visual evidence aligns with Archer's account of Biden's involvement in the controversial decision.
Furthermore, Hunter's own statements about sharing half of his income with his father underscore a financial link that challenges claims of non-involvement. This candid admission contradicts the narrative of complete detachment.
A Legacy of Oversight: Implications for the Future
Ex-White House Aide statements, as well as allegations of FBI oversight, underscore the potential mishandling of Joe Biden's role in Ukraine's business dealings. These allegations, if substantiated, have far-reaching implications for Biden's legacy and the accountability that must be addressed.
A Cascade of Finances: Flow of Funds
The financial trail doesn't stop at Hunter; Archer suggests that millions of dollars flowed into Biden family bank accounts, pointing to a more intricate financial connection. This revelation reinforces the notion of a deeper involvement in family business matters.
The Confluence of Interests: Hunter's Support
In an intriguing twist, it was discovered that Hunter Biden had been covering Joe Biden's expenses. This financial support creates a compelling narrative of mutual dependence, challenging the idea of a clear separation between the Biden family's financial interests.
In conclusion, the layers of evidence and testimonies presented by Devon Archer cast doubt on President Joe Biden's claims of non-involvement and ignorance regarding his family's business dealings. The intricacies of the connections, financial transactions, and personal statements create a narrative that warrants further exploration and scrutiny. The unraveling of this intricate web raises important questions about the extent of Biden's involvement in the family's entrepreneurial pursuits and the implications for his political legacy.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive.
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
