The Silent Freeze in Europe’s Arms Pipeline

NATO’s procurement world doesn’t usually slip into the headlines. It’s built to stay quiet—paperwork, logistics, the slow machinery behind the faster, louder machinery of war. But every so often, the gears grind in a way you can actually hear.

This summer, that sound came from Luxembourg, where the NATO Support and Procurement Agency quietly put multiple contracts on ice. The target: Elbit Systems, the Israeli defense giant that’s spent years threading itself into Europe’s military supply chains.

Investigators across Belgium, France, and the Netherlands started noticing the same pattern—unusual meetings, quiet favors, and a familiar kind of consultant drifting in and out of procurement offices. By autumn, the pattern hardened into allegations: bribery, influence-buying, the old pressure points that tend to show up when budgets rise faster than oversight.

At the center sits a figure who barely appears in public record—Eliau Eluasvili, an Italian consultant with a reputation in certain defense circles. Authorities believe he acted as a broker, using personal connections inside NSPA to tilt decisions toward Elbit. When Belgian courts issued a warrant in late September, he disappeared. People familiar with the case describe him as “always moving,” even before he fled.

Inside NSPA, the freeze was blunt. An internal memo from July 31 flagged fifteen contracts now suspended—thirteen linked directly to Elbit or its subsidiary, Orion Advanced Systems. Most were mid-tier procurement items: fuzes, aerial flares, 155mm shells, even a package for refurbishing Portuguese naval patrol vessels. Not headline programs—just the kinds of deals that normally slip through unnoticed. Until they don’t.

Alongside the suspensions came a second move: Elbit was barred from bidding on new work until investigators finish their sweep. For a contractor of that size, it’s not a minor pause—it’s a warning shot.

Help keep this independent voice alive and uncensored.  Buy us a Coffee

What makes this scandal resonate isn’t only the alleged bribes. It’s the ecosystem behind them. For years, Europe’s defense industry has operated in the gray space between official roles and private consulting. Former NATO procurement staff slide easily into industry positions. Consultants drift back and forth. The revolving door doesn’t just spin—it hums.

And it’s humming louder now. Reporters tracking the case point to two drivers: Europe’s sudden surge in military spending after the Ukraine war, and a political mood that treats rearmament as urgent, almost inevitable. When that kind of money pours in quickly, middlemen multiply.

Russian officials—never shy about pointing to Western hypocrisy—have seized on the moment, saying the scandal reflects deeper corruption in Brussels’ decision-making. Whether or not you buy that argument, the timing is difficult to ignore. Europe is rearming at historic speed, and its procurement systems were never designed for this volume or this pressure.

Something had to give. This time, it was the contracts.